Map Literary: A Journal of Contemporary Writing and Art
  • Home
    • Masthead
    • Submissions
    • Rachel Wetzsteon Chapbook Award
    • In Print
    • Subscribe
    • Links
    • WPU MFA
    • Internship Opportunity
  • Poetry
    • Donald Illich
    • James Reidel
    • Dennis Hinrichsen
    • Keith Mark Gaboury
    • Mark Decarteret
  • Fiction
    • Matthew Serback, "How to Make a Boulder"
    • Kathryn Holzman, "Eating Meat"
    • Pavle Radonic, "The Laboratory"
    • Kaitlyn Burd, "Nature with You in It"
    • Katie Young Foster, "Promotion"
    • William Cordeiro, "Selections from Whispering Gallery"
    • Halsted M. Bernard, "Your Hands"
    • Justin Meckes, "The Gash"
    • Reb Livingston, from "Bombyonder"
    • Craig Foltz, "Without Stigma"
    • On Experimental Fiction
  • Nonfiction
    • Scott Wordsman reviews Petter Lindgren
    • Alexander Clark, "Postdiluvian"
    • Diane Payne, "3 micro memoirs"
    • Luc Sante, "Flesh and Bone"
    • Isobel O'Hare, "Failure: A Love Letter"
    • Melissa Wiley, "Barbed Wire Fence"
    • Ashley Wilkinson, "fractional distillation"
    • Lori Hawks, "The Fix"
  • Art
    • Robin Schwartz
    • Billy Cancel
    • Bill Kotsatos
    • The Scientist
    • Tim J. Myers
    • Derek Owens
    • Leonel Piraino
    • Jean Wolff
    • Matthew Rose
    • Jacob Spriggs
    • Koji Nagai
    • Kristin Allmer
    • Limor Sadot
    • Ark Codex
    • Dahlia Elsayed
    • Yuji Hiratsuka, "Beet Meets Meat"
    • Fabio Sassi, "Rusted Link"
    • Kasey Ramirez, "Edifice"
  • Archives
    • 2017 >
      • Fiction 2017 >
        • Alexandra Renwick, "The Life of an Artifact in Duodecadal Glances"
        • Lizzi Wolf, "My Brother's Therapist"
      • Poetry 2017 >
        • Douglas Piccinnini
        • Matthew McBride
        • Jim Daniels
        • Sally Ashton
        • Raymond Farr
      • Nonfiction 2017 >
        • Charlie Moses, "Dear Friend"
        • Pamela Woolford, "This Is What Happened"
        • Jennifer Martelli, "Phobiacompendia"
    • 2016 >
      • Fiction 2016 >
        • Loie Merritt, "The Edge of the Sea is a Strange and Beautiful Place"
        • Mitchell Grabois, "i"
        • Kelle Groom, "25 Reasons to Attend the Gala"
        • Mike Shepley, "Killing Symbols"
        • Jody Azzouni, "Owning Things"
        • Dan Gutstein, "Like Airplanes and Stars"
        • Kate Imbach, "Diamondland"
      • Poetry 2016 >
        • Jeff Alessandrelli
        • Daniel Coudriet
        • Peter Leight
        • John Wells
        • Jenna Cardinale
        • Isabelle Shepherd
        • Michael Robins
        • Will Walker
        • Bridget Sprouls
        • Allan Johnston
        • Hugh Behm-Steinberg
        • Caroline Knox
        • David Dodd Lee
        • John Deming
        • David McLoghlin
    • 2015 >
      • Poetry 2015 >
        • Adam Clay
        • Kyle Hemmings
        • Matthew Henriksen
        • Megan Kaminski
        • Emily Kendal Frey
        • Noelle Kocot
        • Katy Lederer
        • John Lowther
        • Nathaniel Sverloff
        • Franz Werfel -- James Reidel
      • Fiction 2015 >
        • Erin Bedford, "Riesenrad"
        • James Braziel, "Jick's Chevrolet"
        • James Braziel, "Vittate"
        • Adrian Class, "Or Flights"
        • Erica L. Kaufman, "It Buried Us"
        • Nolan Liebert, "Gravity of Hearts"
        • Heather Noland, "Cosmic Slump"
        • Tom Whalen, "In the Cathedral"
      • Nonfiction 2015 >
        • Rebecca Cook, "What the Hammer Said When the Hammer Hit the Girl"
        • Margot Kelley, "Companion Species"
    • Fall 2014 >
      • Poetry Fall 2014 >
        • Stephanie Anderson
        • John Buckley and Martin Ott
        • Vanessa Couto Johnson
        • John Estes
        • Anne Gorrick
        • Henry Israeli
        • Keegan Lester
        • John Loughlin
        • Douglas Luman
        • Danielle Mitchell
        • Alexandria Peary
        • Marcus Slease
        • Georg Trakl / James Reidel
      • Fiction Fall 2014 >
        • Matt Rowan, "Dog's Best Friend"
        • Kelli Anne Noftle, "Before She Was Olive"
        • Chris Okum, "Ratatat"
        • Jon Fried, "Cashing In"
        • Lisa C. Taylor, "Visible Wounds"
        • Sarah Kahn, "Break"
        • Rebekah Morton, "Big Sis"
      • Nonfiction Fall 2014 >
        • Stephen Benz, "Night Then Morning: Elko, Nevada"
        • Joseph C. Jiuliani, "Of Stealing and of Being Stolen"
        • Lindsay Chudzik, "Jailface"
        • Robert D. Vivian, "Just After Rain"
    • Spring 2014 >
      • Poetry Spring 2014 >
        • Simeon Berry
        • Molly Brodak
        • Wyn Cooper
        • Brian Foley
        • Tim Kahl
        • Caroline Knox
        • Rob MacDonald
        • Benjamin Paloff
      • Fiction Spring 2014 >
        • Gareth David Anderson, "Cupcake"
        • Halsted M. Bernard, "Your Hands"
        • Patrick Cole, "Pick-up Lines"
        • Joshua Graber, "This Fine Experience"
        • Lola Grace, "Natural Birth"
        • Robert E. Tanner, "Non-Disclosure Disagreement"
      • Art Spring 2014
    • 2012 & 2013
  • Pedagogy
Picture

An Interview with Harold Jaffe   


On Revolutionary Brain (Guide Dog Books, 2012)


Q. Would you explain the phrase “as abject, so the sacred”—the book's opening reference to Julia Kristeva?

A. The severely oppressed are dialectically closer to "God." Artists who have articulated this include Blake, Van Gogh, Chekhov, Camus, Simone Weil, Pasolini, and, perhaps most complexly, Jean Genet.


Q. You argue that there will always be a gulf between imaginative effort and result. For young artists and writers, what are the ramifications of recognizing this abyss?

A. No immediate gratification. Possibly no unmediated gratification. That's a tough prospect for a culture addicted to X-games, black ops and faux-drama.


Q. Can watching pornography actually be revolutionary, as the book suggests?

A. In fact that is not what Revolutionary Brain means to suggest. "Revolutionary Post-Mill," where I catalogue porn sites, is meant to display how actual revolution has been mediated and co-opted. The body in passion has been debauched into the bionic body photo-shopped, sponsored (sotto voce) by Disney, Walmart and Exxon.

The porn site catalogue works especially in contrast to the opening "list" of humans on death row in Texas permitted 3 minutes to recite their last words then be executed. Each of these lists is officially prohibited, except that the porn list is prohibited deliberately to be trespassed. With young people sexing (then sexting) they are in effect insulated from doing much else, which is what official culture wants, even as it ritually condemns the enormous multi-billion dollar pornography industry.


Q. How has recent popular culture—the internet, movies, news media—affected contemporary literary fiction? Or perhaps “literary fiction” is a misnomer for you, implying an unwanted or unwarranted separation of high and low cultural forms?

A. Pop culture, and especially technology, have altered art and literature unprecedentedly. The language has changed so radically, so rapidly, that there is scarcely a difference between what Derrrida not so long ago labeled ecriture and parole. Traditional culture’s inclusion of serious art in any genre has been indelibly modified so that an “intelligent” human need not know anything about the “high” arts, about language, about history to be accounted intelligent, so long as s/he know his/her way around technology.

As Paul Virilio put it, mobility (real-time traveling to “broaden the mind”) has become “motility” moving from one geography to another by using your fingers online.


Q. You write provocatively of monstrosities, torture, religious persecution. Do you have particular intentions as to how you want your audience to react? If not, how do you imagine your audience reacts to such charged topics?

A. I write about certain species of extremity, but not about monstrosity as such. After Brecht and contra Aristotle, I want my reader to walk away pent not purged so that s/he, my reader, ruminates with interest and fretfulness about what s/he has read.


Q. Would you discuss your ideas on the relation between political revolt and the personally revolting (the disgusting, the repulsive)?

A. I see revolt and revolting as bound, tied to the hip. We are forever (for as long as this benighted culture endures) indentured to a dying animal.

The so-called revolting are mainly kept out of sight, in prisons or similar institutions, or exiled to the margins of the culture. When Katrina became news and severely impoverished “colored” people were suddenly displayed on TV or the Net, mainstream Americans glanced at each other with a wild surmise. “Could these revolting humans actually be Americans!”


Q. Your work employs numerous allusions—to Tarkovsky, Virginia Woolf, Orwell, Brando, Gandhi, Balthus. How do you think allusion differs in our culture, as opposed to, say, how allusion functioned during the heyday of Modernism (e.g., during the time of T.S. Eliot’s “The Waste Land”)?

A. Few American readers now recognize references to serious culture, but  there are numerous digital prosthetics, such as Wiki, to convey a portion of the letter if not the spirit of the references.

Digital instantaneity to which the culture is addicted privileges visuals that ape electronic transmission or are otherwise rapidly and easily absorbed. Hence, the revival of comic books and Batman movies. What Lionel Trilling once called “sincerity and authenticity” have given way almost entirely to image and soundbite. Of course there are intellectuals and academics who can still gaze at a Rembrandt without stealing a glance at their smartphone, but they are decidedly fewer in number as universities veer in the direction of corporate for-profit institutions.


Q. Your essays frequently utilize an interview format. Do you find the “catechistic” form especially productive? Or are you mocking the interview format, so frequently employed in popular media (news, talk shows)?

A. My use of interview or quasi-interview, especially what I call unsituated dialogue, allows me space to defy narrative “logic,” to zip from one topic to another that is seemingly unrelated, thus to occasionally zap the reader into recognition, or if not into recognition, at least into a slightly different frame of imagining.


Q. How do you feel about the current state of "experimental fiction"? Which experimental authors are producing exceptional work in your opinion?

A. I prefer “innovative”  to “experimental,” which cedes the center to conventional fiction. “Innovative” does not make that concession. Among current innovative writers, I like Pierre Guyotat.



Read Jaffe's "Sacrifice," an excerpt from the book Revolutionary Brain.


Picture
Harold Jaffe is the author of 21 volumes of fiction, docufiction, and non-fiction, including Revolutionary Brain; Othello Blues; OD; Anti-Twitter; Paris 60; Jesus Coyote; 15 Serial Killers; Beyond the Techno-Cave: A Guerrilla’s Guide to Post-Millennial Culture; Terror-dot-Gov; Straight Razor; Sex for the Millennium; Eros Anti-Eros; False Positive; Beasts; Mourning Crazy Horse; Madonna & Other Spectacles; and Dos Indios.

Jaffe’s writing has been translated widely, most recently in Romania, Turkey, France, Japan, Italy, and Cuba. Jaffe is editor-in-chief of Fiction International.



published by
The Department of English
College of Humanities & Social Sciences
The William Paterson University of New Jersey
Copyright  © 2012-2017 Map Literary
Map Literary

Promote Your Page Too
Free E-Subscription
Callaloo: African Arts
On Innovative Fiction
Huizache: Latino Lit
Veterans Writing
Asian Writers
Picture
✕